Competition, Monopoly, and Aftermarkets

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Competition, Monopoly, and Aftermarkets

Consider a durable goods producer that has the option of monopolizing an aftermarket such as repair for its own product. An important question is whether such monopolization reduces welfare? We show that the anwer to this question is frequently no. In particular, we explore three models that illustrate various ways in which aftermarket monopolization can reduce inefficiencies and thus increase ...

متن کامل

Perfect Competition in a Bilateral Monopoly

We show that if limit orders are required to vary smoothly, then strategic (Nash) equilibria of the double auction mechanism yield competitive (Walras) allocations. It is not necessary to have competitors on any side of any market: smooth trading is a substitute for price wars. In particular, Nash equilibria are Walrasian even in a bilateral monopoly.

متن کامل

Product Innovation Incentives: Monopoly vs. Competition

Unlike Arrow’s result for process innovations, the gain from a product innovation can be larger to a secure monopolist than to a rivalrous …rm that would face competition from independent sellers of the old product. A monopolist incurs pro…t diversion from its old good but may gain more than a rivalrous …rm on the new good by coordinating the prices. In a Hotelling framework, we …nd simple cond...

متن کامل

Two Theories of Monopoly and Competition: Implications and Applications

This paper addresses the claim that monopolies arise naturally out of the free market. I show by comparing and contrasting two theories of monopoly—economic and political monopoly—that this is not true. This paper also demonstrates that the two theories of monopoly have their separate roots in two opposite theories of competition: perfect competition and competition as rivalry. I show that only...

متن کامل

Profit-sharing, Bertrand Competition and Monopoly Unions: a Note

This paper studies a strategic aspect of pro t-sharing in an oligopolistic industry with a monopoly union. Whenever a uniform pro t share exists in the industry, we show that a union that values the per worker remuneration positively, may have incentives to reduce industry employment, decreasing thus total output and causing total pro ts to increase. Thus, we show that pro t-sharing may lead to...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization

سال: 2009

ISSN: 8756-6222,1465-7341

DOI: 10.1093/jleo/ewp006